|

One group
that has clearly embraced offshore outsourcing are financial
services companies.
It seems the world's 100 largest financial-services companies
said they expect to transfer an estimated $356 billion of
their operations and two million jobs offshore over the next
five years in efforts to reduce their costs significantly,
according to a survey by Deloitte Research. They also expect
to reduce costs by nearly $1.4 billion each by 2008 by sending
work to low-cost centers like India from developed economies
in North America, Europe and Asia.
Deloitte said the $356
billion estimate is based on a $2.34 trillion total cost
base for the top 100 institutions globally.
This means that the financial-services firms plan to shift,
on average, 15 percent of their global cost base offshore
over the next five years, according to the survey.
Using
that same 15 percent assumption, Deloitte figures that two
million positions of the 13 million people employed in
the financial services sector of North American; the European
Union and Switzerland, and the Asian developed economies
of Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore, will shift to low-cost
offshore locations.
Thirty percent of the respondents currently
have existing offshore operations, and that percentage is
expected to climb
to 75 percent within two years, according to the survey.
The firms said they achieve 39 percent
cost savings from moving operations to low-cost centers where
salaries and
other costs are much lower.
"Offshoring is gaining momentum at
a rapid pace," says
Christopher Gentle, a director at Deloitte Research. "And
getting offshoring experience as soon as possible translates
into greater benefits — from higher cost reductions
to more business processes being handled by the low-cost
centers."
The study draws four principal conclusions:
| 1. |
The offshore trend is driving a radical shift in the
structure of the global financial-services industry and
this transformation is just beginning |
| 2. |
Financial institutions that can utilize their existing
offshore facilities expect significant future savings
because they leverage offshore scale and scope; the challenge
is achieving economies of scale. |
| 3. |
Firms aspiring to move offshore should move quickly
to capture the benefits of doing so, but the challenge
is building capabilities quickly and prudently. |
| 4. |
Firms who don't move offshore risk being left behind
because companies moving offshore estimate future cost
savings at about 45 percent. |
| |
|
However, companies that move operations
offshore are not guaranteed success. More than one-third
of the historical
moves offshore have been unsatisfactory with the institutions
planning no further relocations, according to the survey.
What are the most common reasons for these
moves failing? Cost reductions significantly below the average;
a narrower
scope with fewer functions moved offshore; a scale nearly
one-fourth smaller than average, and a much shorter timeframe
for planning and execution.
What is the most popular place
to shift functions offshore? Nearly half are targeting
India, which has a huge market
of IT professionals who earn much lower wages than elsewhere.
Ireland and South Africa are also attractive offshore centers,
with China, Malaysia and Australia growing in popularity.
"India stands to be the major offshore
hub because of its combination of low cost and high technology
expertise," says
Gentle. "But there's no guaranteed bonanza for India
unless it continues to deliver improved services at globally
competitive wage rates. Competition from other countries
around the Indian Ocean rim from South Africa to Australia
will be fierce."
Deloitte Research estimates more than
one million jobs—or
about half of the estimated relocations—will move to
the Indian Ocean rim over the next five years.
The survey
shows that banks and insurance firms are transferring offshore
such functions as application development, coding
and programming, accounting and finance, operations, processing
and administration, contact support and call-center operations.
Since decisions to go offshore are significant
ones, the chief executive officer, chief financial officer,
chief
information officer or chief operating officer makes
90 percent of them.
And as the size and complexity of the offshore moves
increase, approval by the CEO is set to increase to 45 percent
from
20 percent.
|